Contact: 0330 043 9488 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
2nd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £489187
3rd Place Mary Gill University of Tasmania £374644
4 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
5 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £304374
6 Katherine McConnell Griffith University £240555
7 Edgar University College London £240539
8 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £220908
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183116

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2542263
2nd Place University of Kent £1535299
3rd Place University of Tasmania £1377586
4 University of Glasgow £1342322
5 University of Cambridge £1274982
6 The University of Queensland £1046220
7 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £930857
8 Griffith University £882673
9 Hywel Dda University Health Board £776229
10 University of Nottingham £705260

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £46456
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £32099
3rd Place University College London £15502
4 University of Kent £12282
5 Cardiff University £12122
6 University of Tasmania £11480
7 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £10842
8 University of Liverpool £10295
9 University of Glasgow £9131
10 University of Cambridge £9040

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 610.53 x
2nd Place University of Kent 539.84 x
3rd Place University of Tasmania 484.38 x
4 University of Glasgow 322.36 x
5 Griffith University 310.36 x
6 University of Cambridge 306.12 x
7 The University of Queensland 250.31 x
8 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 216.83 x
9 University of Reading 190.96 x
10 University of Exeter 188.68 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University College London 1300641
2nd Place University of Kent 818303
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 732338
4 University of Cambridge 685443
5 University of Glasgow 653681
6 City of Edinburgh Council 585738
7 University of Tasmania 567716
8 The University of Queensland 527354
9 Griffith University 385557
10 University of Nottingham 319850

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 293753
2nd Place University of Glasgow 244708
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 199985
4 City of Edinburgh Council 176169
5 University of Tasmania 174489
6 University College London 159812
7 Griffith University 138891
8 University of Cambridge 119287
9 The University of Queensland 114650
10 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 112718

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place University College London 5103
2nd Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5089
3rd Place NHS Grampian 3358
4 University of Cambridge 3280
5 University of Oxford 2541
6 Imperial College London 2334
7 University of Reading 2198
8 The University of Queensland 2088
9 The University of Leeds 2043
10 Hywel Dda University Health Board 2004

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 95
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 64
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 47
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 37
6 University of Glasgow 33
7 University of Tasmania 29
8 University College London 27
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23
10 University of Liverpool 23

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place West Midlands Police £6546
2nd Place British Heart Foundation £3515
3rd Place Glasgow City Council £3286
4 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2667
5 University of Technology Sydney £2097
6 Australian Institute of Marine Science £1598
7 An Post £1448
8 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £1334
9 Griffith University £1217
10 University of Kent £916

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £596019
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £532993
3rd Place Glasgow Life £282589
4 Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £273204
5 University College London £232419
6 University of Glasgow £194877
7 University of Kent £144948
8 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
9 Swansea University £73018
10 Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust £72920

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place National Charities £862541
3rd Place East Midlands Charities £692570
4 Welsh Charities £661857
5 West Midlands Charities £582462
6 South East Charities £513875
7 Scottish Charities £326291
8 North East Charities £262623
9 Yorkshire Charities £227422
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Whitby based charity £372278
2nd Place Rom valley based charity £172730
3rd Place Kelso based charity £132766
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



Sorted reuse system!

mike chapman, Humber NHS Foundation Trust

Quick and easy to use, I found just what I was looking for!

Anon, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust

Brilliant concept, saves money and it's really easy to use!

Anon, Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust