Contact: 0330 043 9488 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
2nd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £489237
3rd Place Mary Gill University of Tasmania £379684
4 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
5 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £304374
6 Katherine McConnell Griffith University £267060
7 Edgar University College London £240539
8 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £221273
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183175

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2585017
2nd Place University of Kent £1582823
3rd Place University of Tasmania £1442473
4 University of Glasgow £1378681
5 University of Cambridge £1357493
6 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £1113070
7 The University of Queensland £1052246
8 Griffith University £1019738
9 Hywel Dda University Health Board £822688
10 University of Nottingham £706214

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £42489
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £32737
3rd Place University College London £15296
4 University of Kent £12176
5 University of Tasmania £11540
6 University of Liverpool £11459
7 Cardiff University £11240
8 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £10281
9 University of Cambridge £9298
10 University of Glasgow £9070

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 620.80 x
2nd Place University of Kent 556.55 x
3rd Place University of Tasmania 507.20 x
4 Griffith University 358.56 x
5 University of Glasgow 331.10 x
6 University of Cambridge 326.01 x
7 The University of Queensland 252.70 x
8 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 220.78 x
9 Hywel Dda University Health Board 197.57 x
10 University of Reading 196.17 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University College London 1325516
2nd Place University of Kent 844786
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 766657
4 University of Cambridge 724603
5 University of Glasgow 657858
6 University of Tasmania 591440
7 City of Edinburgh Council 586618
8 The University of Queensland 532379
9 Griffith University 443457
10 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 349161

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 304365
2nd Place University of Glasgow 246397
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 210242
4 University of Tasmania 185939
5 City of Edinburgh Council 176242
6 Griffith University 170796
7 University College London 163714
8 Glasgow Life 138602
9 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 135722
10 University of Cambridge 123563

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5339
2nd Place University College London 5213
3rd Place NHS Grampian 3473
4 University of Cambridge 3352
5 University of Oxford 2609
6 Imperial College London 2363
7 University of Reading 2234
8 The University of Queensland 2140
9 The University of Leeds 2115
10 Hywel Dda University Health Board 2060

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 89
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 56
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 48
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 36
6 University of Glasgow 32
7 University of Tasmania 30
8 University College London 27
9 University of Liverpool 25
10 Cardiff University 24

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place West Midlands Police £8417
2nd Place British Heart Foundation £3528
3rd Place Glasgow City Council £3261
4 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2801
5 University of Technology Sydney £2431
6 Australian Institute of Marine Science £2104
7 Glasgow Life £1584
8 An Post £1448
9 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £1222
10 Griffith University £1213

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £617647
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £533502
3rd Place Glasgow Life £282589
4 Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £275987
5 University College London £233919
6 University of Glasgow £194877
7 University of Kent £146838
8 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
9 Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust £87910
10 Swansea University £73706

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place National Charities £932558
3rd Place Welsh Charities £694180
4 East Midlands Charities £694070
5 West Midlands Charities £584262
6 South East Charities £517490
7 Scottish Charities £347437
8 North East Charities £258743
9 Yorkshire Charities £246112
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Whitby based charity £443391
2nd Place Rom valley based charity £172730
3rd Place Kelso based charity £132766
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



Found the perfect stools for our office, what a brilliant way of working together!

Thank you :)

Anon, FRIMLEY HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

It's a win-win-win for all involved!

Gwen Powell, CleanConscience

It works - what more could I ask? Unless you'd like to bring me a cup of tea? Perhaps also a bacon sandwich?

Andrew Fletcher, Durham University